Skip to main content
. 2017 May 23;21(4):583–589. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1620-0

Table 2.

Postoperative outcome

pNPWT (n = 32) (%) Control (n = 34) (%) p OR
Surgical site infections (overall) 12 (38) 19 (56) 0.135
Wound infection (superficial/deep according to CDC) 7 (24) (n = 29) 16 (51) (n = 31) 0.029 0.30 (95% CI 0.10–0.90)
 Incisional wound infection 2 (7) 15 (48) <0.001 0.08 (95% CI 0.02–0.39)
 Subcutaneous abscesses 5 (17) 4 (13) 0.660
Bowel content leakage 5 (16) 4 (12) 0.648
 Anastomotic leakage 2 (10) (n = 21) 4 (19) (n = 21) 0.378
 Transient small bowel lacerationa 3 (9) 0 (0) 0.068
Intra-abdominal abscessb 4 (13) 2 (6) 0.350
Enterocutaneous fistula 3 (9) 3 (9) 0.938
Non-infected seroma 5 (16) 7 (21) 0.452
Bleeding/hematoma 4 (13) 6 (18) 0.560
Wound dehiscence needing NPWT 6 (19) 7 (21) 0.666
Necrosis partial skin/subcutis 1 (3) 3 (9) 0.332
Interventions extra-abdominal
 Radiologic subcutaneous drainage 7 (22) 8 (24) 0.873
 Opening wound and/or antibioticsc 2 (7) (n = 29) 15 (48) (n = 31) <0.001 0.08 (95% CI 0.02–0.39)
Intervention for intra-abdominal complications
 Radiologic intra-abdominal drainage 9 (28) 8 (24) 0.670
 Relaparotomy 0 (0) 2 (6) 0.262
Hospital stay days (IQR) 19 (9–35) 12 (8–22) 0.161
 Range (5–120) (2–105)
Emergency department visit 9 (28) 13 (38) 0.223
Re-admission 4 (13) 6 (18) 0.492
30-day mortality 0 (0) 0 (0)

Bold values indicate p-value significant if less than 0.05

aOne patient had iatrogenic bowel perforation, two patients had a bowel perforation e.c.i

bIntra-abdominal abscess without any signs of anastomotic leakage or bowel perforation

cSpontaneously due to infection or therapeutic drainage