Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 28;52(4):1445–1472. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12537

Table 3.

Sensitivity of Treatment Incremental Effects on Hospital Readmission to Alternative Sample, Instrument, and Control Function Specifications

Nursing Intervention Only Physician Intervention Only Both Interventions
Percentage Point Change (95% CI) p Value Percentage Point Change (95% CI) p Value Percentage Point Change (95% CI) p Value
LATE sample of 98,730 index stays and 21,076 hospital readmissions −0.90 (−7.00, 5.21) .77 −0.92 (−8.12, 6.29) .80 −8.23 (−12.34, −4.12) <.001
LATT sample of 12,397 index stays and 2,732 hospital readmissions −9.95 (−17.05, −2.85) <.001
LATU sample of 39,617 index stays and 8,355 hospital readmissions −0.82 (−6.55, 4.92) .78 −0.85 (−7.60, 5.91) .81 −7.77 (−11.59, −3.95) .006
LATE sample with instrument modification
Omit hospital follow‐up rate instruments 0.94 (−12.87, 14.76) .89 −15.47 (−35.17, 4.23) .12 −12.50 (−24.65, −0.36) .044
Omit index stay discharge day instruments −2.86 (−9.58, 3.86) .40 −2.08 (−9.82, 5.66) .53 −8.24 (−13.01, −3.47) .001
Add interactions of hospital follow‐up rates −2.48 (−9.21, 4.25) .47 −1.92 (−9.67, 5.83) .63 −8.45 (−13.17, −3.74) <.001
Add squared terms of residuals (quadratic control function) −1.81 (−8.10, 4.47) .57 −1.13 (−8.51, 6.24) .76 −9.40 (−14.01, −4.75) <.001
LATE sample with index stay exclusions
Omit 3,114 critical access hospital discharges 0.97 (−5.47, 7.42) .77 0.82 (−6.86, 8.50) .83 −8.29 (−12.42, −4.17) <.001
Omit 7,222 discharges of persons <age 65 −2.68 (−8.84, 3.48) .39 −3.44 (−10.71, 3.83) .35 −7.47 (−11.92, −3.01) .001
Omit 3,772 discharges where LOS ≤1 day or ≥30 days −0.85 (−7.01, 5.32) .79 −0.86 (−8.24, 6.52) .82 −8.50 (−12.66, −4.33) <.001
LATE sample with follow‐up event exclusions
Omit 1,001 “planned” hospital readmissions −0.01 (−6.14, 6.11) .99 −0.30 (−7.52, 6.91) .93 −8.93 (−12.74, −5.12) <.001
Omit 540 SNF and other facility admissions −0.77 (−6.84, 5.29) .80 −0.85 (−7.99, 6.29) .82 −7.93 (−12.00, −3.86) <.001
LATE sample splitting hospice and death outcomes in the multinomial logit −0.89 (−6.99, 5.22) .78 −0.95 (−8.16, 6.25) .80 −8.22 (−12.33, −4.11) <.001
LATE sample lengthening follow‐up period to 37 days (inclusion of 4,758 day 31–37 events) −2.03 (−8.37, 4.30) .53 −2.10 (−9.68, 5.47) .59 −7.78 (−12.58, −2.95) .002

Control function adjustment for endogenous treatment. Except where indicated: “hospital readmissions” include a relatively small number of admissions to other inpatient settings (e.g., SNFs); and the instruments are index hospital rates of early follow‐up for non–heart failure medical patients and day of the week of index hospital stay discharge (see Methods section).

LATE, local average treatment effects among all patients; LATT, local average treatment effects among patients receiving treatment; LATU = local average treatment effects among patients receiving neither treatment (untreated).

[Correction added on 15 August 2016, after first online publication: layout errors in Tables 1–3 have been corrected, and additional corrections in column and row descriptions in Table 2 have been incorporated.]