Table 3.
Logistic regression results, full sample
| Number of obs (n): 6101 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of children: 3427 | ||||
| Stunting | Wasting | |||
| Coef. (std. error) |
Odds Ratio (95% C.I.) |
Coef. (std error) |
Odds Ratio (95% C.I.) |
|
| SBS | 0.007* (0.002) |
1.007 (1.002, 1.011) |
0.011* (0.005) |
1.011 (1.001, 1.021) |
| Food insecurity | 0.152 (0.098) |
1.165 (0.960, 1.412) |
0.332 (0.198) |
1.393 (0.944, 2.056) |
| Spending | −0.005* (0.002) |
0.995 (0.991, 0.998) |
−0.001 (0.002) |
0.999 (0.995, 1.004) |
| Household head | −0.075 (0.159) |
0.928 (0.680, 1.266) |
−0.151 (0.302) |
0.860 (0.476, 1.553) |
| Average age | −0.008 (0.008) |
0.992 (0.977, 1.007) |
−0.010 (0.017) |
0.990 (0.958, 1.023) |
| Household occupants | −0.029 (0.023) |
0.971 (0.928, 1.016) |
−0.048 (0.041) |
0.953 (0.879, 1.034) |
| Percent female | 0.000 (0.003) |
1.000 (0.995, 1.005) |
0.001 (0.005) |
1.001 (0.991, 1.012) |
| Urban | −0.709* (0.169) |
0.492 (0.354, 0.685) |
−0.329 (0.306) |
0.720 (0.395, 1.312) |
| Father present | 0.205 (0.152) |
1.227 (0.911, 1.653) |
0.223 (0.308) |
1.250 (0.684, 2.287) |
| Mother present | −0.325* (0.162) |
0.723 (0.526, 0.992) |
0.179 (0.340) |
1.196 (0.615, 2.327) |
| Household head educated | 0.009 (0.104) |
1.009 (0.823, 1.238) |
−0.402* (0.205) |
0.669 (0.447, 1.000) |
| Male | 0.404* (0.098) |
1.498 (1.237, 1.815) |
0.445* (0.184) |
1.560 (1.087, 2.240) |
| Region Indicators | x | x | ||
| Year Indicators | x | x | ||
| Log pseudolikelihood | −3053.290 | −807.927 | ||
| Wald X2 = | 88.13 | 56.79 | ||
| Prob > X2 = | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
*indicates p < 0.05. Heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors are clustered at the person-level. OR = ecoef = ratio of the odds of stunting/wasting after a unit increase in the corresponding covariate to the odds before the increase