Skip to main content
. 2017 May 4;48(2):201–218. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12022

Table 1.

Characteristics of study facilities (pre‐intervention), by design group

Design group Facility codea Type of facility Location Catchment population Total FP clients (2009) Number of nurse/ midwives in MCHb Integration structure in 2009 (pre‐intervention)d Pair match facility code
Intervention 23 District hospital Urban (city) 560,230 7,402 14 HTC in FP room 4
3 Provincial hospital Urban (town) 46,707 5,804 7 HTC in FP room 6
10 Health center Peri‐urban (edge of town) 69,363 5,723 6 HTC in FP room 9
21 Sub‐district hospital Urban (town) 46,707 2,871 1 HTC in FP room 25
14 Health center Rural 7,680 1,925 3 HTC within MCH unit, sometimes in same room 13
2 Health center Rural 23,000 2,245 0c HTC in separate room 5
Comparison 4 District hospital Urban (town) 53,541 5,257 8 HTC in FP room 23
6 District hospital Urban (town) 308,000 4,529 3 HTC in FP room 3
9 District hospital Rural 21,525 2,245 3 HTC within PMTCT, not in MCH unit 10
25 Health center Rural 23,516 1,422 3 HTC in FP room (part of PITC) initiative 21
13 Health center Rural 29,880 3,541 6 HTC within MCH unit 14
5 Health center Rural 12,294 2,372 6 HTC within MCH unit 2
a

Code referred to in Mayhew et al. 2016.

b

Registered or enrolled.

c

Only one clinical officer reported.

d

Intervention facilities had previously received integration support.

FP = Family Planning. HTC = HIV testing and counseling. MCH = Maternal and Child Health. PITC = Provider‐initiated testing and counseling for HIV. PMTCT = Prevention of mother‐to‐child‐transmission of HIV.

SOURCE: Integra Periodic Activity Review 2009 (structured tool capturing data on service characteristics and staffing).