Table 2.
Language laterality by method
| Language laterality (LI) by method | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case | Wada | Clinician 1 | Clinician 2 | Fixed Threshold |
| A | L | L (0.64) | L (0.59) | L (0.55) |
| B | L | L (0.35) | L (0.35) | L (0.2) |
| C | L | L (0.46) | L (0.67) | L (0.44) |
| D | L | L (0.63) | L (0.49) | L (0.57) |
| E | R | R (–0.38) | R (–0.27) | R (–0.29) |
| F | L | L (0.55) | L (0.55) | L (0.19) |
| G | L | L (0.36) | L (0.36) | L (0.14) |
| H | R | R (–0.39) | R (–0.48) | R (–0.41) |
| I | L | L (0.37) | L (0.64) | L (0.43) |
| J | L | L (0.07) | M (0.03) | L (0.08) |
| K | L | L (0.32) | L (0.30) | M (0.04) |
| L | L | R (–0.07) | M (–0.03) | L (0.33) |
| M | M | M (0) | R (–0.06) | L (0.08) |
| Na | L | – | – | – |
| O | L | L (0.52) | L (0.57) | L (0.33) |
| P | L | L (0.30) | L (0.3) | L (0.38) |
| Q | L | L (0.12) | L (0.45) | L (0.09) |
| Ra | L | – | – | – |
| S | R | – | – | – |
| T | L | L (0.28) | L (0.09) | L (0.2) |
| U | L | L (0.06) | L (0.12) | L (0.08) |
| V | L | L (0.65) | L (0.65) | L (0.62) |
a
Each clinician independently determined fMRI data quality was too poor (noise) to be used for language mapping.
Laterality index is in brackets. Shaded values represent discordance from Wada result.