Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurol Sci. 2017 Apr 11;377:137–143. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2017.04.011

Figure 3. Adjusted Fall Rate Ratio (RR) and 95% Confidence Intervals, negative binomial model.

Figure 3

Adjusted Odds Ratios estimated from negative binomial regression model of the rate of post-baseline falls (N=1730). Adjusted rate ratios are RR=1.75, 95% CI [1.37, 2.24] for patients reporting baseline UPDRS item 13 > 0 (versus those who did not); RR=0.68, 95% CI [0.59, 0.79] for males; RR=1.10, 95% CI [1.05, 1.14] per 5-year increase in age; RR=1.10, 95% CI [1.04,1.16] per 1-point increase in ambulatory capacity; RR=1.37, 95% CI [1.23,1.53] per 5-point increase in UPDRS ADL; RR=0.88, 95% CI [0.83,0.93] per 1-point increase in TFC; RR=0.71, 95% CI [0.60, 0.83] for use of dopamine agonist alone at baseline; all else being held constant. For TFC higher scores represent “better” clinical status at baseline. For all else, higher scores are “worse”.