Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Econ J (London). 2016 Dec 7;126:F184–F231. doi: 10.1111/ecoj.12356

Table A4.

The Impact of RoSLA on Child English/Literacy and Mathematics Outcomes, Parents With Lower Levels of Education, ±3 Year Sample Window

Entry Assessment literacy Key Stage 1 literacy score Key Stage 2 English score Key Stage 3 English score English language GCSE Entry Assessment maths Key Stage 1 maths score Key Stage 2 maths score Key Stage 3 maths score Maths GCSE
RoSLA treatment of mother        0.120***
  (0.045)
    0.115*
  (0.068)
0.011
  (0.257)
0.799
  (0.924)
0.665
  (0.504)
0.063
  (0.062)
     0.165**
  (0.071)
0.397
  (0.264)
0.236
  (1.250)
0.973
  (0.599)
RoSLA treatment of father      0.111**
  (0.056)
       0.263***
  (0.084)
0.393
  (0.319)
1.835
  (1.142)
0.966
  (0.631)
0.089
  (0.077)
       0.322***
  (0.089)
    0.587*
  (0.328)
2.093
  (1.551)
       2.139***
  (0.744)
Mother has A levels,equivalent or higher      0.141**
  (0.061)
       0.311***
  (0.092)
       1.026***
  (0.344)
       4.854***
  (1.211)
       3.303***
  (0.669)
     0.193**
  (0.085)
       0.302***
  (0.097)
       1.006***
  (0.353)
    3.107*
  (1.656)
       3.557***
  (0.795)
Father has A levels,equivalent or higher        0.149***
  (0.050)
       0.411***
  (0.076)
       1.316***
  (0.279)
       5.489***
  (0.995)
       2.875***
  (0.546)
       0.232***
  (0.069)
       0.407***
  (0.080)
       1.600***
  (0.286)
       8.406***
  (1.356)
       5.083***
  (0.649)
Mother’s age at child’s birth: pre-window      0.022**
  (0.009)
0.001
  (0.013)
0.048
  (0.051)
    0.310*
  (0.183)
0.163
  (0.101)
0.020
  (0.013)
     0.033**
  (0.014)
0.080
  (0.052)
0.213
  (0.243)
0.164
  (0.117)
Mother’s age at child’s birth: in window      0.022**
  (0.009)
0.017
  (0.013)
    0.092*
  (0.049)
     0.433**
  (0.178)
       0.254***
  (0.097)
     0.024**
  (0.012)
       0.041***
  (0.013)
     0.109**
  (0.050)
    0.408*
  (0.238)
       0.328***
  (0.115)
Mother’s age at child’s birth: post-window        0.028***
  (0.011)
0.021
  (0.016)
    0.103*
  (0.061)
     0.504**
  (0.219)
     0.304**
  (0.120)
    0.028*
  (0.015)
       0.051***
  (0.017)
     0.136**
  (0.062)
    0.524*
  (0.295)
       0.399***
  (0.142)
Father’s age at child’s birth: pre-window     0.015*
  (0.008)
    0.023*
  (0.012)
    0.083*
  (0.045)
0.207
  (0.165)
     0.186**
  (0.093)
0.015
  (0.011)
       0.040***
  (0.013)
0.031
  (0.047)
0.286
  (0.226)
0.161
  (0.108)
Father’s age at child’s birth: in window      0.021**
  (0.009)
    0.027*
  (0.015)
     0.112**
  (0.054)
0.262
  (0.196)
     0.223**
  (0.110)
    0.022*
  (0.013)
       0.050***
  (0.015)
0.048
  (0.056)
0.371
  (0.268)
    0.213*
  (0.129)
Father’s age at child’s birth: post-window      0.027**
  (0.012)
    0.034*
  (0.018)
    0.118*
  (0.067)
0.251
  (0.242)
    0.251*
  (0.136)
0.023
  (0.016)
       0.061***
  (0.019)
0.052
  (0.069)
0.508
  (0.332)
0.229
  (0.159)
R2 0.226 0.219 0.171 0.187 0.172 0.214 0.228 0.173 0.109 0.179
Observations 2,007               2,356               2,479               2,119               2,316               2,005               2,353               2,476               2,203               2,313              
Outcome mean   4.92   2.85 26.79 44.62 39.69   5.18   3.13 26.84 80.23 37.58
Outcome SD   0.79   1.30   4.87 16.26   9.24   1.09   1.37   5.00 21.43 10.98
Treatment as % of SD (mum only) 15.25   8.83   0.23   4.91   7.20   5.82 11.98   7.93   1.10   8.86
Treatment as % of SD (dad only) 14.12 20.24   8.07 11.28 10.46   8.19 23.44 11.73   9.77 19.48
Treatment as % of SD (both) 29.37 29.08   8.30 16.20 17.65 14.01 35.42 19.66 10.87 28.34
Treatment joint significance p-value 0.005 0.002 0.467 0.205 0.144 0.326 0.000 0.075 0.400 0.006

Notes.

*

p < 0.10,

**

p < 0.05,

***

p < 0.01.

Additional controls included: child gender, month of birth, GCSE cohort, parent foreign qualifications, single mother dummy, father missing info dummy, child performance IQ.