Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 22;8(6):e101. doi: 10.1038/ctg.2017.26

Table 2. Cost-effectiveness of non-stratified and risk-stratified HCC screening strategies.

Strategy QALE Cost ICER ICER
      (vs. US2 × -100%) (vs. US2 × -15%)
No screening 6.40 $42,961    
         
Reference strategies
 Regular US screening (100% adherence; US2 × -100%) 6.51 $51,761 Reference  
 Regular US screening (15% adherence; US2 × -15%) 6.39 $44,078   Reference
         
Non-stratified experimental strategies
 MRI for all (MRI-100%) 6.57 $56,871 85,167 71,072
 AMRI for all (AMRI-100%) 6.55 $53,883 53,050 61,281
         
Risk-stratified strategies (for high–intermediate–low risk groups)
 US4 × -US2 × -US2 × 6.50 $54,601 Dominated 95,664
 MRI-US2 × -US2 × 6.54 $54,442 89,367 69,093
 AMRI-US2 × -US2 × 6.53 $53,437 83,800 66,850
 US2 × -US2 × -none 6.52 $50,417 Dominant 48,762
 US4 × -US4 × -none 6.51 $54,391 Dominated 85,942
 MRI-MRI-none 6.58 $53,966 31,500 52,042
 AMRI-AMRI-none 6.56 $51,866 2,100 45,812
 US4 × -US2 × -none 6.52 $52,300 53,900 63,246
 MRI-US2 × -none 6.55 $52,140 9,475 50,388
 AMRI-US2 × -none 6.54 $51,136 Dominant 47,053
 US2 × -none-none 6.48 $47,086 Less effective 33,422
 US4 × -none-none 6.47 $48,969 Less effective 61,137
 MRI-none-none 6.51 $48,809 Dominant 39,425
 AMRI-none-none 6.50 $47,804 Less effective 33,873

AMRI, abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; ICER, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; QALE, quality-adjusted life expectancy; US, ultrasound. Dominant, improved QALE with lower cost; dominated, worse QALE with higher cost; less effective, reduced efficacy with lower cost; 2/4 ×, screening two/four times a year; MRI and AMRI are biannual. Risk-stratified strategies are named as screening modality in high-risk subjects–intermediate-risk subjects–low-risk subjects. For example, MRI-none-none corresponds to screening by MRI in high-risk subjects and no screening in intermediate- and low-risk subjects.