Table 5.
Explaining Variation in Attention for Workforce Aging and the Pro-activating and Counteractivating Frame.
| Attention |
Pro-activating Frame |
Counteractivating Frame |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | SE | B | SE | B | SE | |
| Lagged dependent variable | 0.131 | 0.040** | 0.057 | 0.038† | 0.031 | 0.042 |
| Conservative (vs. progressive) newspapers | −0.460 | 0.183* | −2.593 | 1.895 | 3.327 | 1.829† |
| Financial crisis (second phase) | −0.147 | 0.247 | −4.020 | 2.416† | 5.556 | 2.324* |
| Governments’ ideology stance on economic issues (left–right) | −0.130 | 0.068† | −0.057 | 0.785 | −1.392 | 0.738† |
| EPL | −0.114 | 0.148 | 4.461 | 1.654** | 2.380 | 1.676 |
| Social insurance | 0.000 | 0.000† | 0.000 | 0.000 | −0.001 | 0.000 |
| Unemployment | 0.502 | 0.612 | −1.822 | 6.509 | 8.616 | 6.213 |
| Long-term unemployment | −0.395 | 0.617 | 3.204 | 6.571 | −8.086 | 6.273 |
| No. of articles | 4.851 | 0.539*** | 2.257 | 0.523*** | ||
| Constant | 1.687 | 0.582** | 2.460 | 6.277 | 16.029 | 6.004 |
| R 2 | .089 | .169 | .087 | |||
Note. The data predict changes in attention, pro-activating, and contra-activating framing. Cell entries are unstandardized coefficients and standard errors; No. of articles is centered around its grand mean. EPL = employment protection legislation.
†
p < .10. *p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001.