Table 3.

Comparisons of model fit for models containing age and menopausal markers (anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), antral follicle count (AFC), and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH). Odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for age, AMH, AFC, and FSH shown; bold type indicates statistical significance at p<0.05.^*

	Odds ratios (95% confidence intervals)	C-statistic	Akaike Information Criterion (AIC)	Likelihood ratio test vs. models with age alone	Likelihood ratio test vs. models with age and AMH
Age alone		0.83	254.9	-	-
Age (years)	7.4 (4.1, 13.6)
Age and AMH		0.91	199.4	<0.001
Age (years)	4.1 (2.1, 7.9)
AMH (ng/dl)	0.13 (0.05, 0.34)
Age and AFC		0.84	250.1	0.009
Age (years)	6.5 (3.5, 12.0)
AFC (number)	0.33 (0.13, 8.2)
Age and FSH		0.85	239.4	<0.001	0.077
Age (years)	6.1 (3.3, 11.3)
FSH (IU/L)	0.79 (0.18, 3.6)
Age, AMH, FSH		0.92	198.3	<0.001
Age (years)	3.9 (2.0, 7.8)
AMH (ng/dl)	0.18 (0.07, 0.43)
FSH (IU/L)	0.47 (0.10, 2.3)
Age, FSH, AFC		0.86	238.5	<0.001	0.275
Age (years)	5.7 (3.0, 10.6)
AFC (number)	0.47 (0.19, 1.2)
FSH (IU/L)	0.77 (0.17, 3.4)
Age, AMH, AFC		0.91	200.2	<0.001
Age (years)	4.1 (2.1, 8.0)
AMH (ng/dl)	0.12 (0.04, 0.31)
AFC (number)	2.0 (0.57, 6.9)
Age, AMH, FSH, AFC		0.91	198.3	<0.001	0.070
Age (years)	3.9 (2.0, 7.8)
AMH (ng/dl)	0.15 (0.06, 0.39)
FSH (IU/L)	0.44 (0.09, 2.2)
AFC (number)	2.4 (0.69, 8.6)

^*For estimation of odds ratios, model assumptions are shown for women aged 45–49 years, with AFC 0–10 follicles, FSH 0–13.9 IU/L, and AMH 0.09–0.50 ng/dl.