Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 20;12(7):e0181631. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181631

Table 1. Sex, age and other group distributions and group-specific likelihoods of patients presenting with tennis elbow (TE) problem at encounter (April 2000 –March 2015).

Sex* Number of encounters at which TE was managed % sex distribution (95% CI) Sex-specific likelihood (%) of TE (95% CI)
Male 1,505 47.7 (45.8–49.5) 0.25 (0.24–0.27)
Female 1,652 52.3 (50.5–54.2) 0.19 (0.18–0.20)
All known sex 3,157 100.0  
Age group* (years) Number of encounters at which TE was managed % age distribution (95% CI) Age-specific likelihood (%) of TE (95% CI)^
< 1 year 1 0.0 (0.0–0.1) 0.00 (0.00–0.01)
1–4 years 0 . (.–.) 0.00 (0.00–0.00)
5–14 years 13 0.4 (0.2–0.6) 0.02 (0.01–0.03)
15–24 years 65 2.1 (1.5–2.6) 0.05 (0.04–0.06)
25–34 years 199 6.3 (5.4–7.2) 0.12 (0.10–0.14)
35–44 years 827 26.2 (24.6–27.8) 0.46 (0.43–0.50)
45–54 years^ 1,171 37.1 (35.3–38.8) 0.59 (0.55–0.62)
55–64 years 616 19.5 (18.1–20.9) 0.31 (0.28–0.33)
65–74 years 181 5.7 (4.9–6.6) 0.10 (0.08–0.11)
75+ years 86 2.7 (2.1–3.3) 0.04 (0.03–0.05)
All known age 3,159 100.0  
Non-English speaking background (NESB) status* Number of encounters at which TE was managed % NESB status distribution (95% CI) NESB-specific likelihood (%) of TE (95% CI)
Non-English speaking background 303 10.6 (9.2–11.9) 0.27 (0.23–0.30)
English speaking background 2565 89.4 (88.1–90.8) 0.21 (0.20–0.22)
Indigenous status* Number of encounters at which TE was managed % Indigenous status distribution (95% CI) Indigenous status-specific likelihood (%) of TE (95% CI)
Indigenous 32 1.2 (0.8–1.6) 0.15 (0.10–0.20)
Non-Indigenous 2606 98.8 (98.4–99.2) 0.21 (0.21–0.22)
Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS)* Number of encounters at which TE was managed % ASGS distribution (95% CI) ASGS-specific likelihood (%) of TE managed at encounter (95% CI)
Major Cities 2186 70.7 (68.8–72.5) 0.22 (0.21–0.23)
Inner Regional 592 19.1 (17.5–20.7) 0.22 (0.20–0.24)
Outer Regional 263 8.5 (7.4–9.6) 0.20 (0.18–0.23)
Remote 37 1.2 (0.8–1.6) 0.23 (0.16–0.30)
Very Remote 16 0.5 (0.2–0.8) 0.20 (0.10–0.30)

*Missing: Of 1,471,600 encounters in total, the numbers of missing for each group were as follows: sex 13,262, age 12,385, Non-English speaking background 142,171, Indigenous status 236,818, and ASGS 39,140. Of 3181 encounters where TE was managed, the numbers of missing for each group were as follows: sex 24, age 22, NESB 313; Indigenous status 543; and ASGS 87.

^Example: As an example, of 198,900 encounters with patients aged 45–54 years, the likelihood that TE was managed at any one of these encounters was 0.59% (95% CI: 0.55–0.62); i.e. TE was managed at approximately 6 per 1000 encounters with patients aged 45–54 years.