Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 20;12(7):e0181631. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181631

Table 2. GP participant sex and age distributions and group-specific likelihoods for tennis elbow (TE) problem at encounter (April 2000 –March 2015).

Sex Number of GPs who managed at least one TE problem at any of the 100 encounters % sex distribution of these GPs ^GP sex-specific likelihood (%) of managing TE at any of the 100 encounters (95% CI)^
Male^ 1,824 68.7 19.8 (19.0–20.6)
Female 830 31.3 15.1 (14.2–16.1)
All known sex 2,654 100.0  
Age group (years)* Number of GPs who managed at least one TE problem at any of the 100 encounters % age distribution of these GPs GP age-specific likelihood (%) of managing TE at any of the 100 encounters (95% CI)^
<35 years 158 6.0 16.2 (13.9–18.5)
35–44 years 612 23.2 19.3 (17.9–20.7)
45–54 years 945 35.8 18.9 (17.8–20.0)
55+ years 922 35.0 16.8 (15.8–17.8)
All known age 2,637 100.0  

*Missing: Of 14,716 GP participants in total, GP age was missing for 90. Of 2,654 GPs who managed at least one TE problem at any of the 100 encounters, age was missing for 17.

^Example: As an example, of 9,226 male GPs, the likelihood that TE was managed at any of the sample 100 encounters was 19.8% (95% CI: 19.0–20.6)