Table 2. GP participant sex and age distributions and group-specific likelihoods for tennis elbow (TE) problem at encounter (April 2000 –March 2015).
Sex | Number of GPs who managed at least one TE problem at any of the 100 encounters | % sex distribution of these GPs | ^GP sex-specific likelihood (%) of managing TE at any of the 100 encounters (95% CI)^ |
Male^ | 1,824 | 68.7 | 19.8 (19.0–20.6) |
Female | 830 | 31.3 | 15.1 (14.2–16.1) |
All known sex | 2,654 | 100.0 | |
Age group (years)* | Number of GPs who managed at least one TE problem at any of the 100 encounters | % age distribution of these GPs | GP age-specific likelihood (%) of managing TE at any of the 100 encounters (95% CI)^ |
<35 years | 158 | 6.0 | 16.2 (13.9–18.5) |
35–44 years | 612 | 23.2 | 19.3 (17.9–20.7) |
45–54 years | 945 | 35.8 | 18.9 (17.8–20.0) |
55+ years | 922 | 35.0 | 16.8 (15.8–17.8) |
All known age | 2,637 | 100.0 |
*Missing: Of 14,716 GP participants in total, GP age was missing for 90. Of 2,654 GPs who managed at least one TE problem at any of the 100 encounters, age was missing for 17.
^Example: As an example, of 9,226 male GPs, the likelihood that TE was managed at any of the sample 100 encounters was 19.8% (95% CI: 19.0–20.6)