Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Child Youth Serv Rev. 2016 Dec 7;73:173–181. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.12.002

Table 3. Final Cluster Centers.

1 - Robust Relative Household (n=15) 2 - Robust Family Network (n=28) 3 - Disrupted Family Network (n=30) 4 - Shared Parenting (n=33) 5 -Non-Relative Parenting (n=32)
Family network size 11.27 9.39 3.37 4.15 5.22
Foster household size 6.67 4.71 3.80 4.27 3.90
Family members in foster household 6.20 3.36 1.30 1.33 1.38
Bio-Relative Adults in foster household 2.13 1.32 .37 .15 .19
Bio-Relative Youth in foster household 3.93 1.86 .83 1.12 1.00
Non-Relative Adults in foster household .47 .54 1.40 1.79 1.72
Non-Relative Youth in foster household* .00 .82 1.10 1.15 .81
Family members in contact 5.20 6.18 2.07 2.82 3.84
Relationship quality with bio mom .73 9.29 8.97 7.33 .53
Relationship quality with bio dad 4.53 1.78 .37 9.27 3.28
Relationship with foster parent(s)* 9.13 7.89 8.63 8.45 8.73
*

Not a significant clustering variable