Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Child Youth Serv Rev. 2016 Dec 7;73:173–181. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.12.002

Table 4. Differences in Personal and Placement Characteristics and Outcomes by Cluster Groups.

Sample (N=138) 1 - Robust Relative Household 2 - Robust Family Network 3 - Disrupted Family Network 4 - Shared Parenting 5 - Non-Relative Parenting F (4, 133) or x2 (4) p
Age 13.01 12.77 12.97 13.04 13.20 12.93 .263 .901
Gender (% female) 52.2% 66.7% 42.9% 66.7% 42.4% 50.0% 6.080 .193
Race (% persons of color) 50.0% 60.0% 46.4% 40.0% 54.5% 53.1% 2.341 .673
Lives in relative care 36% 87% 71% 20% 18% 16% 45.483 .000
Lives with sibling 73% 93% 86% 60% 76% 63% 9.974 .041
Relationship with Sibling (1-10) 7.62 8.33 7.46 7.07 7.85 7.69 .890 .472
Youth-reported quality of life (YQOL-S) 82.2 83.33 86.77 79.81 84.89 77.23 1.614 .175
Youth-reported hopelessness (HSC) 30.17 32.13 28.86 29.63 30.03 31.00 .626 .645
Parent-reported trauma symptoms (PROPS) 15.64 10.864 10.964 17.19 20.681,2 15.63 4.040 .004
Parent-reported behavior problems (CBCL) 60.38 59.43 61.79 60.75 61.84 57.71 .625 .645

Note. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test for statistically significant group differences on the four outcome variables, with a Tukey post-hoc test for individual group differences (shown with subscripts referring to the category columns in the order listed in the table). Given the number of statistical tests, a Bonferroni correction for Type I error rate would be p < .0125.