Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 6.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Pers. 2017 Jan 6;31(1):42–62. doi: 10.1002/per.2087

Table 5.

Responders’ self-reported trait levels (R) and the responders’ ratings of the targets’ traits (S) predicting romantic interest in the target (without controlling for confounding variables)

Trait Intercept R S R2 R*S S2
Mate Value −.24 −1.15 .11 .12 .32 .07
Physical Attractiveness 1.11* −.26 .51* −.02 .11* .04
Mate Value – Reduced −.06 1.35 .22 .21 .26 .01
Slow Life History Strategy −.42 −.90 .46 .17 .26 −.06
Openness to Experience −.40 −.11 .23 −.02 .07 −.06
Conscientiousness −.39 −.32 .34* .05 .08 −.09
Extraversion −.43 −.12 .01 .01 .09 .01
Agreeableness .55* .07 .36* −.003 −.01 .10*
Emotional Stability .70* .17 .34* −.02 −.03 −.05

Note: Unstandardized b coefficients are presented. Coefficients that are statistically significant (padj < .05) are presented in boldface.