Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 20.
Published in final edited form as: J Org Chem. 2017 Apr 11;82(8):4297–4304. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.7b00285

Table 2.

Carbonyl stretching frequencies, donor–acceptor geometries and interaction energies, and hydrolytic stabilities of compounds 1ae and 2ae.

Probe νC=O (cm−1)a dX···C (Å)b θX···C=O (°)b Enπ* (kcal/mol)b ΔEX,C=O (kcal/mol)b t1/2 (h)c
1a 1766 3.06 80.9 0.20 4.7
1b 1774 2.97 77.0 0.22 0.85 1.8
1c 1774 3.25 84.7 0.54 0.98 11
1d 1776 3.50d, 3.55e 91.0d, 92.1e 0.25d, 0.33e 0.46d, 0.54e 33
1e 1774 3.62d, 3.65e 91.0d, 92.1e 0.40d, 0.44e 0.81d, 1.01e >2,000
2a 1766 3.41 85.1 0.11 ND
2b 1770 3.27 85.9 0.22 0.19 ND
2c 1774 3.00 85.8 0.51 1.10 ND
2d 1772 3.13 87.6 0.52 1.17 ND
2e 1767 3.59 91.1 0.51 1.03 ND
a

Measured with FT-IR spectroscopy.

b

Calculated for each X···C=O interaction in the optimized geometry.

c

Experimental half-life for spontaneous hydrolysis in OptiMEM containing FBS (10% v/v).

d

Data for 4′,5′-halo substituents.

e

Data for 2′,7′-halo substituents.

ND, not determined.