Table 4.
Author | n | Region | Arms | PFS in months | OS in months | Second line received* |
Rosell et al3 | 173 | Europe | Erlotinib | 9.7 | 19.3 | NR |
Docetaxel or gemcitabine with either cisplatin or carboplatin | 5.2 | 19.5 | 76% | |||
Zhou et al4 | 165 | China | Erlotinib | 13.1 | 22.8 | NR |
Gemcitabine with carboplatin | 4.6 | 27.2 | NR | |||
Maemondo et al5 | 230 | Japan | Gefitinib | 10.8 | 30.5 | 67.5% |
Paclitaxel/carboplatin | 5.4 | 23.6 | 94.6% | |||
Mitsudomi et al6 | 177 | Japan | Gefitinib | 9.2 | 30.9 | NR |
Docetaxel/cisplatin | 6.3 | NR | NR | |||
Sequist et al7 | 345 | East Asia, Europe, Australia | Afatinib | 11.1 | NR | NR |
Pemetrexed/cisplatin | 6.9 | NR | NR | |||
Current study | 290 | India | Gefitinib | 8.4 | 18 | 63.8% |
Pemetrexed carboplatin followed by pemetrexed maintenance | 5.6 | 22.6 | 93.6% |
*The percentage of patients who received second line among patients who were eligible for same.
NR, not reported; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival.