Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 27;2(1):e000168. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000168

Table 4.

Comparison of median PFS and OS reported in the current study with that reported in literature.

Author n Region Arms PFS in months OS in months Second line
received*
Rosell et al3 173 Europe Erlotinib  9.7 19.3 NR
Docetaxel or gemcitabine with either cisplatin or carboplatin  5.2 19.5 76%
Zhou et al4 165 China Erlotinib 13.1 22.8 NR
Gemcitabine with carboplatin  4.6 27.2 NR
Maemondo et al5 230 Japan Gefitinib 10.8 30.5 67.5%
Paclitaxel/carboplatin  5.4 23.6 94.6%
Mitsudomi et al6 177 Japan Gefitinib  9.2 30.9 NR
Docetaxel/cisplatin  6.3 NR NR
Sequist et al7 345 East Asia, Europe, Australia Afatinib 11.1 NR NR
Pemetrexed/cisplatin  6.9 NR NR
Current study 290 India Gefitinib  8.4 18 63.8%
Pemetrexed carboplatin followed by pemetrexed maintenance 5.6 22.6 93.6%

*The percentage of patients who received second line among patients who were eligible for same.

NR, not reported; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival.