Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 21.
Published in final edited form as: Int Urogynecol J. 2016 May 18;27(11):1689–1696. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3026-4

Table 1.

EMG measurements and number of identified innervation zones for all subjects

EMG measurement of the EAS muscle EMG Decomposition Results

Session I
Short contractions
Session II
Long contractions
Vaginal Probe Rectal Probe

Subject ID RMS (μV) C.V. (%) RMS (μV) C.V. (%) # of MUs # of Total MUAP Repetitions # of MUs # of Total MUAP Repetitions
01 4.1 ± 0.8 19.5 7.5 ± 1.5 20.0 2 35 7 258
02 23.6 ± 3.0 12.7 19.3 ± 3.1 16.1 8 218 15 456
03 26.0 ± 3.4 13.1 20.0 ± 4.2 21.0 10 183 10 240
04 32.4 ± 6.0 18.5 31.7 ± 5.7 18.0 6 99 8 136
05 22.5 ± 2.5 11.1 17.9 ± 2.1 11.7 N.A. N.A. 8 335
06 16.2 ± 2.3 14.2 17.2 ± 3.8 22.1 1 28 8 229
07 57.6 ± 16.6 28.8 53.0 ± 14.3 27.0 6 158 11 331
08 17.7 ± 4.6 26.0 10.4 ± 3.6 34.6 3 30 9 115

Mean 25.0 18.0 22.1 21.3 5.1 107 9.5 262
S.D. 14.6 6.1 13.5 6.5 3.0 74 2.4 104

Data are presented as mean ± SD; Decomposition was performed using one contraction dataSignals from subject 09 and 10 and vaginal EMG signals from subject 05 were discarded due to contaminated data