Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 22;4(1):e000203. doi: 10.1136/vetreco-2016-000203

Table 2:

Proportion of individual positive animals and milk tank (concentrated and not concentrated) results to antibodies to BoHV-1

Individual milk samples Non-concentrated BTM samples Concentrated BTM samples Status
Farm Sampling* % positive animals† (LCL–HCL 95%) %IN‡ BTM
(cut-off≤25)
%IN BTM concentrated (cut-off≤5) Calculated prevalence
1 1 0.0 0.0 (neg) 0.0 (neg) <4%
2 0.0 0.0
3 0.0 0.0
4 0.0 0.0
2 1 97.6 (96.1–99.2) 92.5 (pos) 96.0 (pos) ≥25%
2 93.9 (91.3–96.4) 89.7 (pos) 93.5 (pos) ≥25%
3 98.2 (96,7–99.6) 81.9
4 92.12 (89.2–95.0) 89.3
3 1 4.5 (0.6–8.4) 6.4 (neg) 35.5 (pos) 4%–25%
2 1.7 (0.00–4.0) 10.6 (neg) 12.1 (pos) 4%–25%
3 1.5 (0.0–3.5) 0.00
4 0.8 (0.0–2.4) 0.9
4 1 5.0 (1.8–8.2) 11.2 (neg) 40.5 (pos) 4%–25%
2 4.00 (1.1–6.9) 18.1 (neg) 30.3 (pos) 4%–25%
3 2.2 (0.1–4.3) 0.00
4 2.8 (0,4–5.3) 19.5
5 1 10.1 (6.9–13.2) 20.8 (neg) 48.6 (pos) 4%–25%
2 6.5 (4.0–9.0) 19.9 (neg) 37.6 (pos) 4%–25%
3 5.3 (3.1–7.5) 0.00
4 6.3 (3.8–8.8) 19.5

*Number of sampling. 1=autumn, 2= winter, 3= spring and 4= summer.

†% Positive animals referred for individual analysis.

‡%IN: inhibition percentages.

Estimated prevalence according to the results of the BTM, whether concentrated or not.

BoHV-1, bovine herpesvirus type 1; BTM, bulk tank milk; HCL, higher concentration limit; LCL, lower concentration limit.