Table 3. Relative abundance (±s.d.) of significant different groups (P<0.05, FDR<0.3) between responders and non-responders at t12w.
| Phylum/Class | Genus-like level |
Relative abundance±s.d. |
Fold | P-value | FDR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-responders | Responders | |||||
| Clostridium cluster XI | Peptostreptococcus anaerobius et rel. | 0.081±0.223 | 0.007±0.002 | 0.09 | 0.0078 | 0.1133 |
| Clostridium cluster XIVa | *Anaerostipes caccae et rel. | 1.387±1.825 | 2.030±1.461 | 1.46 | 0.0219 | 0.2436 |
| *Clostridium nexile et rel. | 0.599±0.427 | 1.174±0.689 | 1.96 | 0.0041 | 0.0766 | |
| Clostridium sphenoides et rel. | 0.668±0.366 | 1.391±0.875 | 2.08 | 0.0027 | 0.0710 | |
| *Clostridium symbiosum et rel. | 1.477±0.773 | 2.910±2.595 | 1.97 | 0.0299 | 0.2775 | |
| *Coprococcus eutactus et rel. | 2.719±2.908 | 7.954±5.932 | 2.93 | 0.0015 | 0.0659 | |
| Dorea formicigenerans et rel. | 1.761±1.044 | 3.031±0.840 | 1.72 | 0.0005 | 0.0319 | |
| *Eubacterium hallii et rel. | 0.611±0.554 | 0.917±0.422 | 1.50 | 0.0047 | 0.0766 | |
| *Eubacterium ventriosum et rel. | 0.446±0.471 | 1.863±2.967 | 4.18 | 0.0219 | 0.2436 | |
| *Lachnospira pectinoschiza et rel. | 1.416±1.036 | 3.704±2.600 | 2.62 | 0.0020 | 0.0665 | |
| Outgrouping Clostridium cluster XIVa | 0.658±0.652 | 2.483±3.165 | 3.77 | 0.0003 | 0.0319 | |
| Ruminococcus gnavus et rel. | 0.548±0.856 | 0.669±0.525 | 1.22 | 0.0244 | 0.2436 | |
| Ruminococcus lactaris et rel. | 0.204±0.289 | 0.460±0.533 | 2.25 | 0.0244 | 0.2436 | |
| *Ruminococcus obeum et rel. | 7.155±7.532 | 10.934±4.323 | 1.53 | 0.0041 | 0.0766 | |
Abbreviation: FDR, false discovery rate.
‘Fold’ shows relative differences in abundance between responders/non-responders.
*Groups including known butyrate-producing bacteria.