Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 15.
Published in final edited form as: Eur Urol Focus. 2016 Apr 23;2(6):633–639. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.03.017

Table 4. CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and ABCB1 SNP associations with toxicity outcomes reported in previous studies.

Study Patient cohort (n) Toxicity outcome SNP OR (95% CI) p value Multiple testing
Diekstra [23] mRCC, sunitinib (333) Hypertension CYP3A4 rs4646437 2.4 (1.1–5.2) 0.021 No
Garcia-Donas [19] mRCC, sunitinib (84) Toxicity-related DR CYP3A5 rs776746 3.75 (1.67–8.41) 0.022 Yes
Diekstra [11] mRCC, sunitinib (333) Hypertension CYP3A5 rs776746 4.70 (1.47–15.0) 0.009 Yes
Toxicity-related DR 2.04 (1.04–4.00) 0.039 Yes
Van Erp [12] mRCC, sunitinib (219) Hand-foot syndrome ABCB1 rs1045642/ rs1128503/ rs2032582 haplotype 0.39 (0.16–0.94) 0.035 Yes
Beuselinck [30] mRCC, sunitinib (96) Median time to DR ABCB1 rs1128503 2.278 (1.07–4.82) 0.031 No
ABCB1 rs2032582 2.106 (1.01–4.37) 0.046 No
Garcia-Donas [19] cc-mRCC, sunitinib (101) Hypertension ABCB1 rs1128503 ABCB1 rs2032582 0.41 (0.20–0.81) 0·42 (0·21–0·84) 0.011 0.014 No
Diekstra [11] mRCC, sunitinib (333) Mucosal inflammation ABCB1 rs1128503/ rs2032582 0.19 (0.04–0.83) 0.028 Yes
Toxicity grade >2 ABCB1 rs1045642 0.04 No

SNP = single-nucleotide polymorphism; OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; mRCC = metastatic renal cell carcinoma; cc = clear cell; DR = dose reduction