. 2017 Jul 7;13(7):e1006889. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006889

Table 2. Phenotype comparison between normal and drought stress conditions.

Traits	Whole				*indica*				*japonica*
Traits	N	D	D/N	P-value	N	D	D/N	P-value	N	D	D/N	P-value
DLR	0.38	0.41	1.09	1.27×10⁻³	0.37	0.33	0.90	0.0107	0.36	0.32	0.89	0.0967
DVR	0.08	0.10	1.21	1.45×10⁻³	0.07	0.07	0.93	0.4123	0.08	0.07	0.83	0.1419
DWR	0.09	0.12	1.31	2.28×10⁻⁵	0.08	0.08	1.04	0.6059	0.07	0.10	1.37	0.0392
Traits	*ind*				*ind I*				*ind II*
Traits	N	D	D/N	P-value	N	D	D/N	P-value	N	D	D/N	P-value
DLR	0.39	0.35	0.88	0.1030	0.36	0.30	0.85	0.0478	0.36	0.35	0.95	0.5006
DVR	0.09	0.09	1.02	0.8801	0.07	0.06	0.86	0.3748	0.07	0.06	0.90	0.4088
DWR	0.09	0.10	1.13	0.4358	0.07	0.07	1.04	0.7917	0.08	0.08	0.96	0.7589
Traits	*jap*				*tej*				*Trj*
Traits	N	D	D/N	P-value	N	D	D/N	P-value	N	D	D/N	P-value
DLR	0.39	0.36	0.94	0.6816	0.32	0.25	0.77	0.0122	0.45	0.48	1.08	0.3544
DVR	0.09	0.05	0.55	0.0414	0.07	0.05	0.74	0.1386	0.11	0.12	1.10	0.5894
DWR	0.12	0.11	0.89	0.6983	0.05	0.08	1.56	0.1099	0.10	0.14	1.43	0.0229

N, normal conditions; D, drought stress conditions; D/N, the ratio of the value under normal conditions versus the value under drought stress conditions. P-values in bold represent significant difference.