Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Radiology. 2017 Apr 10;284(2):451–459. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161687

Table 1.

Clinical data of 18 patients participating in the study.

Patient Age (y) PSA level (ng/mL) Prostate volume (cc) Lesion characteristics Pathologic tumor stage

Size (cc) Gleason grade Location Total number of ROIs per lesion (from different slices)
P01 65 13.1 32.3 5.8 4+3 PZ 7 pT3a

P02 65 4.6 67.5 0.1 3+4 TZ 1 pT2c
0.1 3+3 TZ 1
2×0.1 3+3 PZ 2

P03 67 8 94.7 0.7 3+3 PZ 4 pT2c
2×0.2 3+3 PZ 4
0.5 3+3 TZ 2
0.3 3+3 TZ 3

P04 62 6.5 31.0 3.2 4+3 PZ 6 pT3a
0.2 4+3 PZ 2
0.1 3+3 PZ 1
0.5 3+3 TZ 4

P05 80 7.2 128.3 0.1 3+3 PZ 2 pT2a

P06 64 7.6 32.3 7.5 4+3 PZ 8 pT3a
0.9 3+3 PZ 4

P07 75 18.2 41.1 3.3 4+3 PZ 5 pT2c
1.5 3+3 PZ 4
3×0.1 3+3 PZ 3
4×0.1 3+3 TZ 4
5×0.2 3+3 TZ 9

P08 62 13.5 23.4 6.8 4+5 PZ 8 pT3b
0.3 3+3 PZ 2
3×0.1 3+3 PZ 3

P09 75 7.9 31.0 0.9 4+5 PZ 2 pT3a
0.5 4+3 PZ 1
0.3 3+3 TZ 2

P10 69 18.4 39.5 6.2 4+5 TZ 5 pT3a

P11 66 7.4 32.5 1.0 3+4 PZ 1 pT3a

P12 67 6 17.7 1.3 3+4 PZ 3 pT3a
0.1 3+3 PZ 1
0.6 3+3 TZ 2

P13 58 6.7 31.4 6.1 3+4 PZ 8 pT3a
3.3 3+4 PZ 5

P14 58 12 20.2 3.9 3+4 PZ 5 pT3a
0.1 3+3 PZ 1
0.2 3+3 TZ 1

P15 66 31.6 44.9 6.6 4+3 PZ 9 pT3a

P16 75 8.5 36.6 3.2 4+5 PZ 4 pT3a
0.4 4+5 PZ 2
0.1 3+3 PZ 1

P17 63 51 26.4 9.5 4+5 PZ 6 pT3b

P18 62 13.3 33.3 2.1 4+4 PZ 4 pT3a