Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 19;32(8):1179–1190. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2800-1

Table 1.

Baseline demographics and disease characteristics

RAS wild-type RAS wild-type/BRAF wild-type
Panitumumab + mFOLFOX6 (n = 88) Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX6 (n = 82) Panitumumab + mFOLFOX6 (n = 77) Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX6 (n = 79)
Male sex, n (%) 58 (66) 56 (68) 50 (65) 55 (70)
Age, years – median (range) 62 (23–82) 60 (39–82) 62 (23–82) 60 (39–82)
ECOG PS, n (%)
 0 or 1 88 (100) 81 (99) 77 (100) 78 (99)
 Missing 0 (0) 1 (1) 0 (0) 1 (1)
Primary tumour diagnosis, n (%)
 Colon 64 (73) 57 (70) 53 (69) 54 (68)
 Rectum 24 (27) 25 (30) 24 (31) 25 (32)
Primary tumour location, n (%)
 Left 53 (60) 54 (66) 52 (68) 53 (67)
 Right 22 (25) 14 (17) 13 (17) 13 (16)
 Unknown/unavailable 13 (15) 14 (17) 12 (16) 13 (16)
Sites of metastases, n (%)
 Liver only 23 (26) 22 (27) 21 (27) 22 (28)
 Liver + other 43 (49) 34 (41) 37 (48) 33 (42)
 Other only 22 (25) 26 (32) 19 (25) 23 (29)
Number of metastatic sites, median (range) 2 (1–5) 2 (0–4) 2 (1–5) 2 (0–4)
Sum of longest diameters of all target lesions, mm – mean (standard deviation)a 129.0 (117.2) 109.1 (84.5) 131.6 (123.5) 110.2 (85.2)
CEA levels, μg/L – median (range) 12.8 (0–8543) 15.2 (1–4889) 12.6 (0–8453) 15.6 (1–4889)

aSum of longest diameters of target lesions was missing/unknown for one patient in the bevacizumab group

CEA carcinoembryonic antigen, ECOG PS Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status