Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 14;11:1301–1307. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S134656

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of EyeGo users (n=7) and their relationship with image quality

Characteristic n (%) Odds ratioa (95% confidence interval)
Ageb – median (interquartile range) 20 (20, 36) 0.915c (0.77 to 1.09)
Highest level of training/education
 Undergraduate student 2 of 7 (28.6)
 Undergraduate degree 1 of 7 (14.3)
 Lab technician 1 of 7 (14.3)
 Multipurpose health worker (female) 2 of 7 (28.6)
 Land surveyor 1 of 7 (14.3)
“How comfortable do you feel using a smartphone?”d
 Very comfortable 4 of 7 (57.1) 1.25 (1.13 to 1.39)
 Somewhat comfortable 1 of 7 (14.3)
 Neutral 1 of 7 (14.3)
 Somewhat uncomfortable 1 of 7 (14.3)
 Very uncomfortable 0 of 7 (0.0)
“How comfortable do you typically feel while assessing problems with the eye?”d
 Very comfortable 2 of 7 (28.6) 1.17 (1.07 to 1.29)
 Somewhat comfortable 1 of 7 (14.3)
 Neutral 3 of 7 (42.9)
 Somewhat uncomfortable 1 of 7 (14.3)
 Very uncomfortable 0 of 7 (0.0)

Notes:

a

Estimated by using a binary regression model with image quality <4 or ≥4 as the outcome variable and age, comfort using a smartphone, and comfort in assessing problems with the eye as predictors;

b

median age was used, as the distribution was non-normal when tested by using the Shapiro–Wilk test statistic;

c

calculated by 10-year intervals in age;

d

EyeGo users were asked these two questions prior to screening.