Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of EyeGo users (n=7) and their relationship with image quality
Characteristic | n (%) | Odds ratioa (95% confidence interval) |
---|---|---|
Ageb – median (interquartile range) | 20 (20, 36) | 0.915c (0.77 to 1.09) |
Highest level of training/education | ||
Undergraduate student | 2 of 7 (28.6) | |
Undergraduate degree | 1 of 7 (14.3) | |
Lab technician | 1 of 7 (14.3) | |
Multipurpose health worker (female) | 2 of 7 (28.6) | |
Land surveyor | 1 of 7 (14.3) | |
“How comfortable do you feel using a smartphone?”d | ||
Very comfortable | 4 of 7 (57.1) | 1.25 (1.13 to 1.39) |
Somewhat comfortable | 1 of 7 (14.3) | |
Neutral | 1 of 7 (14.3) | |
Somewhat uncomfortable | 1 of 7 (14.3) | |
Very uncomfortable | 0 of 7 (0.0) | |
“How comfortable do you typically feel while assessing problems with the eye?”d | ||
Very comfortable | 2 of 7 (28.6) | 1.17 (1.07 to 1.29) |
Somewhat comfortable | 1 of 7 (14.3) | |
Neutral | 3 of 7 (42.9) | |
Somewhat uncomfortable | 1 of 7 (14.3) | |
Very uncomfortable | 0 of 7 (0.0) |
Notes:
Estimated by using a binary regression model with image quality <4 or ≥4 as the outcome variable and age, comfort using a smartphone, and comfort in assessing problems with the eye as predictors;
median age was used, as the distribution was non-normal when tested by using the Shapiro–Wilk test statistic;
calculated by 10-year intervals in age;
EyeGo users were asked these two questions prior to screening.