Table 1.
Variable | Piscivorous state | Function and performance | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
Snout shape | Long and slender | Higher angular velocity of jaw tip during lateral head sweeping and jaw closing, thus favorable for catching small agile prey | Taylor, 1987; Thorbjarnarson, 1990; McHenry et al. 2006 |
Degree of heterodonty (tooth size disparity) | Less degree of heterodonty (coupled with less undulated jaw margin) | Efficient for detaining relatively docile prey, but inefficient for holding larger prey firmly | Iordansky, 1973; Busbey, 1995 |
Spacing of teeth | Widely spaced | Striking and impaling prey | Langston, 1973 |
Tooth count | Increased in number | Increase the chance of catching prey and facilitates transport of the food items towards the pharynx (while inertial feeding) | Busbey, 1995 |
Tooth shape | Long, slender and recurved | Striking and impaling prey, and maneuvering fish back toward gullet | Langston, 1973; Massare, 1987; Busbey, 1995 |
Size of STF | Increased | Increased mass of M. pseudotemporalis, which is assciated with rapid but weak jaw adduction | Iordansky, 1964; Endo et al. 2002 |
Ventral extension of pterygoid flange | Reduced | Reduced mass and moment arm of Mm. pterygoidei dorsalis et ventralis (strong jaw adductors), and reduction in maximal mouth opening | Iordansky, 1964; Endo et al. 2002; Piras et al. 2014 |
Development of basioccipital tubera | Highly developed and pendulous | Modified neck musculature (M. longissimus capitis profundus and M. rectus capitis anticus major; Tsuihiji 2007) advantageous for head motions during fish eating (e.g. lateral head sweeping) | Langston, 1973 |
Length of lower jaw symphysis | Elongated | Incur higher strain under loads used for feeding upon large prey | Walmsley et al. 2013 |
STF, supratemporal fenestra.