Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 15.
Published in final edited form as: Stat Med. 2017 May 11;36(18):2947–2960. doi: 10.1002/sim.7332

Figure 3.

Figure 3

NAS results: average estimated exposure effects on the pulse pressure among carriers of the H63D variant (G = 1) or subjects with wild types (G = 0), under different study designs using the FCL (n = 200, N = 706). Personal cumulative lead exposure was measured at patella bone on a continuous scale, and then dichotomized to reflect a rare exposure with a prevalence of 0.1 (High: ≥ 52μ g/g). The numbers on the graph show estimated and corresponding 95% confidence interval of exposure effects by genetic subgroups in a full cohort analysis using linear mixed model with random intercept and random slope of time.