Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 24;8:807. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00807

Table 2.

Comparison of clinical and laboratory findings in two studies of Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome patients: current (Deripapa et al.) and Wolska-Kuśnierz et al. (6).

Categories Current study by Deripapa et al. Wolska-Kuśnier et al. (6)
Number of patients 35 149
M/F ratio, % 46/54 51/49
Median age, years 13.4 14.3
Infections
 Mild 49 34
 Severe 51 66
Opportunistic infections, % 0 5
Immunoglobulin substitution, % 100 68
Correlation of T cell defect with severity of infections No correlation of infections and T-cell excision circles No correlation of infections and CD3+ lymphocyte numbers
Laboratory predictors of severe infections Low kappa-deleting recombination excision circles (KRECs) Low Igg
Autoimmune complications, % 34 10
Interstitial lymphocytic lung disease, % 11 No/not reported
Malignancies, % 57 42
Median age of first malignancy 6.0 10.3
Solid tumors, % of all malignancies 4 11
Died from malignancy, % 25 44
Reduced chemotherapy protocols, % 35 “Mostly reduced”
Underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), % 43 10
HSCT age 8.8
Alive after HSCT, % 80 71
Relapse of malignancy after HSCT, % 7 0
Deceased patients, % 26 39
Median age of death, years 9.5 11.1
Cause of death
 Malignancy and complications, % 75 59
 Infections, % 12.5 14
 Infections during HSCT, % 12.5 5
 Other, % 22
Poor prognosis predictors, clinical No HSCT Severe infections malignancy
Poor prognosis predictors, laboratory Low KRECs Not found