Skip to main content
. 2017 May 23;6(5):e005126. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.005126

Table 2.

Cox Regression Models for Severe CVD, Stroke, MI, and CHF Comparing RYGB to Controls

Severe Composite CVD (N=173) Stroke (N=80) MI (N=29) CHF (N=79)
HR [95% CI] P Value HR [95% CI] P Value HR [95% CI] P Value HR [95% CI] P Value
Unadjusted 0.69 [0.50–0.94] 0.018 0.77 [0.49–1.21] 0.251 0.85 [0.41–1.79] 0.675 0.53 [0.33–0.85] 0.0089
Adjusteda 0.58 [0.42–0.82] 0.0018 0.73 [0.45–1.17] 0.188 0.89 [0.41–1.92] 0.764 0.38 [0.22–0.64] 0.0003

BMI indicates body mass index; BP, blood pressure; CHF, congestive heart failure; CHOL, cholesterol; CVD, cardiovascular disease; FRS, Framingham Risk Score; HDL, high‐density lipoprotein; HTN, hypertension; HR, hazard ratios; MI, myocardial infarction; RYGB, Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass.

The hazard ratios (HR) are for risk of CVD within the RYGB group (HR <1 indicates lower risk in the RYGB group).

a

Adjusted for FRS, sex, diabetes mellitus, age, BMI, smoking, HTN treatment, systolic BP, CHOL, HDL, race, diastolic BP, and statin use.