Skip to main content
. 2017 May 8;6(5):e005648. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005648

Table 2.

Calcification and BHV Structural Valve Degeneration

Group Number Analyzed Implant Duration (Y, Mean±SE) Ca Content of Explant (μg/mg, Mean±SE)
Unimplanted bovine pericardial leaflets 5 N/A 7.07±0.30
Unimplanted porcine aortic valve cusps 5 N/A 0.60±0.08
Entire explants population 47 8.63±0.42 124.24±15.30
BP explants 36 8.52±0.43 142.00±16.95
PAV explants 11 8.94±1.24 66.28±29.49*
Stenosis 20 7.77±0.62 153.64±23.23
Regurgitation plus stenosis 20 8.81±0.68 123.14±22.93
Regurgitation only 7 10.31±0.87 43.63±30.22
DM 11 7.16±0.66 168.79±30.99
No DM 36 9.05±0.49 110.68±17.18
CABG 16 6.89±0.73 124.81±27.75
With DM 7 7.30±0.85 169.19±37.98
Non‐CABG 31 9.61±0.44 124.00±18.58
With DM 4 6.93±1.19 168.09±61.29

BHV indicates bioprosthetic heart valve; BP, bovine pericardial; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; DM, diabetes mellitus; N/A, not assessed; PAV, porcine aortic valve.

Statistically significant differences between calcium content are shown comparing all explants and unimplanted (P<0.001, Welch t test), BP (bovine pericardial) and PAV (porcine aortic valve) explants (*P=0.035, Welch t test), and regurgitation only and stenosis only ( P=0.049, 1‐way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc correction).