Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 24.
Published in final edited form as: Immunome Res. 2011 May;7(2):3. doi: 10.4172/1745-7580.1000046

Table 3a.

Comparison of anchor residue preference identified with automatic approach with published motifs and those using positional scanning combinatorial libraries

Pool sequencing motif
Combinatorial library motif
Automatically derived motif
System Allele P2 P3 P5 P6 P9 P2 P3 P5 P6 P9 P2 P3 P5 P6 P9
HLA A*0201 LM[IVATQ] VL[MIAT] L[MQ] VI[LA] LM VL
A*3001 YF L RK KA[LVIY] KR K
A*3201 [MLITVQS] [WIFYHT] TMIQLVS[A] FIYLW MLTV FIW
A*6802 [LMTVATQS] [LMTVAT] VTS[LALMP] VALI TV V
B*0702 P L[FWYIVMA] P[VA] LFAYI[M] P FML
B*0801 RK RK LIVM RHKF F[RH] LFMVIA[E] HKR F FIML
B*1501 QL FY FY[M] MLQ FY
B*1503 QK FY QMK[LHASE] F[MY] KMQ FY
B*2705 R KRLYANFMIK R R. FLMWY FIHKMLRY
B*3501 P YFMLI[WVA] PA FYM[A] P FMY
B*5101 APG VI[FWYLMA] PA[GQVS] I[V] P IV
B*5301 P WFL[YIVMA] PA[IY] FC[IW] P W
B*5401 P [FWYLIVMA] A[P] AV P A
B*5801 AST FW STA[VG] WFIY[MC] AST w
H-2 Db N LIVM N[L] IML[VF] N IML
Dd G P RK LFI G P FLI[C] G P FIMLRTV
Kd YF LIYM Y ILV[M] Y HIL
Kk E LIVM E[D] IV[FL] E I