Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Surf Interface Anal. 2017 Mar 16;49(4):238–252. doi: 10.1002/sia.6123

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Comparison of IMFPs for water calculated from optical data by various authors with our IMFPs from the FPA (solid line) as shown in Table 1, the SPA (long- and short-dashed line), SSPA (long-dashed line), EM (short-dashed line) and the SSPA* (dotted line) models for energies between 10 eV and 10 keV. (a) The solid circles show the IMFPs calculated by Ashley et al. [3] for energies from 40 eV to 10 keV. (b) The solid squares show the IMFPs calculated by Laverne et al. [4] for energies from 25 eV to 10 keV. (c) The solid diamonds show the IMFPs of Tomita et al. [5] for energies from 25 eV to 10 keV. (d) The solid diamonds show the IMFPs of Dingfelder et al. [6] for energies from 10 eV to 10 keV. (e) The downward triangles and half-solid squares show the IMFPs of Akkerman and Akkerman [7] for energies from 40 eV to 10 keV with and without an exchange correction, respectively. (f) The half-solid squares show the IMFPs of Tung et al. [8] for energies from 10 eV to 10 keV.