Table 3.

Models of Generalized Estimating Equation for the relationship between HTW phenotype and fasting glycemia, systolic and diastolic blood pressure after one-year follow-up in students from a city of Bahia, Brazil, 2006

- HTW phenotype Absent PresentQICc***	Fasting glycemia Coefficient (95% CI); p value*
	Crude Reference 3.11 (1.35-4.86); 0.001 128.540	Final model† Reference 3.87 (1.68-6.05); 0.001 112.716
- HTW phenotype Absent PresentQICc‡	Systolic Blood Pressure Coefficient (95% CI); p value*
	Crude Reference 2.97 (-0.11- 6.06); 0.06 125.375	Final model† Reference 3.67 (1.55-6.08); 0.02 118.265
- HTW phenotype Absent PresentQICc‡	Diastolic Blood Pressure Coefficient (95% CI); p value*
	Crude Reference 1.43 (-1.20- 4.05); 0.28 90.724	Final model† Reference 1.45 (-1.20- 4.10); 0.29 83.872

Sample size- 492; HTW: hypertriglyceridemic waist.

^*Generalized Estimating Equation – GEE;

^†Adjusted by gender, age, maternal education; socioeconomic status and level of physical activity;

^‡QICC: quasi-likelihood corrected under the criterion of Independence model for.