Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Orthop Res. 2017 Feb 9;35(10):2251–2259. doi: 10.1002/jor.23527

Table 2.

Associations between changes (intervention – control) in KAM (first peak and second peak) and changes (intervention – control) in peak varus knee angle during loading, peak ankle eversion angle in stance, and COP (first and second halves of stance). Pearson correlation coefficients (95% confidence intervals) and p-values are presented. Bold indicates significance at the 0.05 level.

Variable First Peak KAM Second Peak KAM
R (95% CI) P-value R (95% CI) P-value
Peak Ankle Eversion Angle in Stance
 Normal Speed -0.230 (-0.751, 0.468) 0.522 0.050 (-0.599, 0.659) 0.892
 Fast Speed -0.188 (-0.731, 0.501) 0.746 0.219 (-0.476, 0.746) 0.543
Peak Varus Knee Angle in Loading
 Normal Speed 0.773 (0.278, 0.943) 0.009 0.735 (0.195, 0.933) 0.016
 Fast Speed 0.619 (-0.017, 0.898) 0.056 0.671 (0.071, 0.914) 0.034
COP1
 Normal Speed -0.247 (-0.453, 0.759) 0.492 --- ---
 Fast Speed 0.045 (-0.602, 0.656) 0.901 --- ---
COP2
 Normal Speed --- --- -0.304 (-0.783, 0.403) 0.393
 Fast Speed --- --- 0.276 (-0.428, 0.771) 0.439