Table 2.

Summary of indirect effects tests.

Indirect effect tested	Path A		Path B		Path C’		Indirect effect (AB)
	(X → M)		(M → Y.X)		(X → Y.M)		95% confidence interval
	β	p	β	p	β	p	Lower	Point	Upper
Brazil
Exercise
CFC-Future → Promotion → Attitudes	0.547	0.000	0.180	0.036	0.052	0.520	-0.008	0.099†	0.213
Promotion → Attitudes → Intentions	0.204	0.030	0.314	0.000	-0.092	0.332	0.011	0.064∗	0.147
Healthy Eating
CFC-Future → Promotion → Attitudes	0.547	0.000	-0.012	0.915	0.083	0.483	-0.120	-0.007	0.124
Promotion → Attitudes → Intentions	0.028	0.786	0.351	0.000	0.070	0.423	-0.061	0.010	0.088
New Zealand
Exercise
CFC-Future → Promotion → Attitudes	0.485	0.000	0.287	0.004	0.238	0.038	0.050	0.173∗	0.369
Promotion → Attitudes → Intentions	0.383	0.000	0.427	0.000	0.093	0.373	0.102	0.164∗∗∗	0.243
Healthy Eating
CFC-Future → Promotion → Attitudes	0.485	0.000	0.173	0.105	0.281	0.024	-0.015	0.084	0.218
Promotion → Attitudes → Intentions	0.308	0.000	0.575	0.000	0.019	0.802	0.090	0.176∗∗∗	0.276

^†p = 0.07, ^∗p < 0.05, ^∗∗∗p < 0.001, Path A, relationship between independent variable (IV) and mediator; Path B, relationship between mediator and dependent variable (DV), controlling for IV; Path C’, direct effect of IV on DV, controlling for mediator. Lower, lower bound of confidence interval; Point, point estimate; Upper, upper bound of confidence interval. Indirect effect is significant if confidence interval does not include zero. CFC, consideration of future consequences.