Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 24;7:6213. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06305-w

Table 2.

Hit Rates for Each Stimulus and Response Type, as well as BPS Scores (Means and SD) During the Memory Anterograde task in Session One and Two between the Alcohol and Sober Condition.

Target Lure Foil BPS score
Old Similar New Old Similar New Old Similar New
Alcohol  (n = 43) Session one 0.61 (0.26) 0.18 (0.14) 0.22 (0.25)* 0.41 (0.18) 0.32 (0.16)* 0.27 (0.24)* 0.13 (0.13) 0.20 (0.13) 0.67 (0.22) 0.12 (0.15)
Session two 0.65 (0.27) 0.20 (0.20) 0.16 (0.21)* 0.41 (0.19) 0.39 (0.19)* 0.20 (0.20)* 0.11 (0.14) 0.23 (0.20) 0.66 (0.26) 0.17 (0.20)
Sober  (n = 45) Session one 0.70 (0.23)* 0.19 (0.20) 0.12 (0.15)* 0.41 (0.16) 0.40 (0.22) 0.18 (0.16)* 0.11 (0.13) 0.23 (0.19) 0.65 (0.23) 0.16 (0.20)
Session two 0.65 (0.21)* 0.17 (0.13) 0.18 (0.18)* 0.39 (0.14) 0.36 (0.20) 0.25 (0.18)* 0.11 (0.11) 0.19 (0.15) 0.71 (0.17) 0.16 (0.19)

*Significant at p < 0.05.

**Significant at p < 0.001.

Accurate hit rates are reflected by correctly responding to the stimulus targets, lures, or foils as “old”, “similar”, or “new”, respectively, with higher scores reflecting proportion of hits for each. False alarms to both lures (“old”|lure) and foils (“old”|foil), can also be observed, as well as incorrect “similar” responses to targets (“similar”|target) and foils (“similar”|foil).