RMAC |
RMSD after minimization of the large ligand, when aligned onto the small ligand’s complex (Å) |
6×10−7
|
0.74 |
|
Pocket Volume |
Volume of the pocket in the structure of the smaller ligand (Å3) |
9×10−5
|
0.68 |
|
MW |
Molecular weight of the smaller ligand (Da) |
4×10−4
|
0.67 |
|
FO score |
Fraction overlap of the smaller ligand with the “binding energy hot spot” from the larger ligand, defined in 24
|
5×10−4
|
0.66 |
✓ |
Buried SASA |
Solvent accessible surface area buried upon binding of the smaller ligand (Å2) |
9×10−4
|
0.65 |
|
Num heavyatoms |
Number of non-hydrogen atoms in the smaller ligand |
4×10−4
|
0.64 |
|
clogP |
Computed octanol-water partition coefficient |
0.02 |
0.61 |
|
pActivity |
−log10 of the smaller ligand’s Kd/Ki |
0.005 |
0.61 |
|
RMSDpocket |
RMSD difference of binding site residues between the two ligand-bound structures (Å) |
0.03 |
0.60 |
✓ |
B-factor |
Crystallographic B-factors of the binding site residues, relative to the rest of the (smaller ligand’s) protein structure |
0.06 |
0.57 |
|
Pocket druggability |
Predicted druggability score (from PockDrug) |
0.07 |
0.58 |
|
Pocket hydrophobicity |
Hydrophobicity of pocket residues |
0.08 |
0.57 |
|
θlig
|
Fraction of the smaller ligand’s SASA that remains exposed upon binding to the protein |
0.2 |
0.56 |
|
Intermolecular Hbonds |
Number of intermolecular hydrogen bonds in the smaller ligand’s complex |
0.02 |
0.53 |
|
Fraction polar |
Frequency of polar residues in the smaller ligand’s binding pocket |
0.2 |
0.53 |
|
Fraction aromatic |
Frequency of aromatic residues in the smaller ligand’s binding pocket |
0.4 |
0.50 |
|
Num rotatable bonds |
Number of rotatable bonds in the smaller ligand |
0.1 |
0.50 |
|