Table 2.
Latent Class 1 | Latent Class 2 | |
---|---|---|
Model 1 | ||
Wave 1 vs. Wave 2 | ||
Latent Class 1 | .988 | .012 |
Latent Class 2 | .020 | .980 |
Wave 2 vs. Wave 3 | ||
Latent Class 1 | .919 | .081 |
Latent Class 2 | .004 | .996 |
Wave 3 vs. Wave 4 | ||
Latent Class 1 | .961 | .039 |
Latent Class 2 | .005 | .995 |
Wave 4 vs. Wave 5 | ||
Latent Class 1 | .938 | .062 |
Latent Class 2 | .010 | .990 |
Model 2 | ||
Latent Class 1 | .993 | .007 |
Latent Class 2 | .050 | .950 |
Notes: Latent transition analyses were performed using Mplus 7.4. Model 1 and Model 2 both feature hidden Markov first-order latent transitions assuming measurement invariance over time. Model 1 allows differing transition matrices over time whereas Model 2 assumes a single transition matrix across all time points.