Table 3.
Unadjusted associations between household HFIAS score tobacco use and socio-demographic factors by bivariate 14 analyses
| HFIAS score (mean and SD) | test value | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Men’s age | O.22 | 0.894 | |
| 15-25 | 3.36 (4.45) | ||
| 26-35 | 3.64 (4.80) | ||
| 36-49 | 3.43 (4.65) | ||
| Women’s age | 4.86 | 0.088 | |
| 15-25 | 3.41 (4.55) | ||
| 26-35 | 3.37 (4.55) | ||
| 36-49 | 4.02 (5.03) | ||
| Men’s tobacco use | 39.18 | <0.001 | |
| None | 2.79 (4.08) | ||
| Either smoking or SLT use | 3.82 (4.82) | ||
| Dual user | 4.96 (5.32) | ||
| Women’s tobacco use | 0.773 | 0.679 | |
| None | 3.42 (4.56) | ||
| Either smoking or SLT use | 3.68 (4.84) | ||
| Dual user | 3.33 (4.58) | ||
| Women’s educational level | 2.75 | 0.428 | |
| No education | 3.35 (4.55) | ||
| Primary | 3.51 (4.67) | ||
| secondary | 3.55 (4.59) | ||
| Higher | 3.79 (4.94) | ||
| Men’s educational level | 556.0 | <0.001 | |
| No education | 6.44 (5.55) | ||
| Primary | 5.20 (4.97) | ||
| secondary | 2.83 (4.10) | ||
| Higher | 1.13 (2.69) | ||
| Men’s occupation | 198.0 | <0.001 | |
| Unemployed | 2.18 (3.77) | ||
| Professional/service/business | 1.92 (3.75) | ||
| Agriculturist | 4.36 (4.75) | ||
| Manual workers | 3.62 (4.75) | ||
| Number of household membersa | 0.121 | <0.001 | |
| Sex of the household head | |||
| Male | 3.50 (4.66) | 0.803 | 0.337 |
| Female | 3.13 (4.15) | ||
| Household’s Wealth Index | 1046.5 | <0.001 | |
| Poorest | 7.16 (5.1) | ||
| Poorer | 5.02 (4.64) | ||
| Middle | 3.43 (4.29) | ||
| Richer | 2.48 (4.07) | ||
| Richest | 0.94 (2.48) | ||
| Urban/rural area | 11.8 | <0.001 | |
| Rural | 2.41 (4.18) | ||
| Urban | 3.97 (4.71) | ||
| Development region | 184.0 | <0.001 | |
| Eastern | 2.48 (3.92) | ||
| Central | 3.11 (4.56) | ||
| Western | 3.10 (4.42) | ||
| Mid-western | 5.17 (5.19) | ||
| Far-western | 3.81 (4.47) | ||
| Ecological zone | 28.17 | <0.001 | |
| Mountainous | 3.77 (4.53) | ||
| Hilly region | 3.61 (4.48) | ||
| Tear (Plains) | 3.22 (4.71) | ||
aSpearman’s rank correlation test was used, numbers in bold indicate significant associations