Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nutr Cancer. 2017 Mar 21;69(4):573–579. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2017.1296964

Table 3.

Unadjusted Comparison of Abdominal Adipose Tissues for Cases and Controlsa

Cases
(n= 79)
Controls
(n= 79)
p-valueb
Abdominal Depots Median (IQR) Median (IQR)
TAT(cm2) 294(294) 347(259) 0.29
SAT (cm2) 133(91) 170(134) 0.03*
SSAT (cm2)b 88(39) 112(65) <0.01*
DSAT (cm2)b 67(49.8) 176(35) 0.04*
VAT (cm2) 140(192) 149(152) 0.93
SM (cm2) 162(38) 176(35) 0.10
VAT/TAT (%) 44(23) 40(21) 0.11
VAT/SAT (%) 91(93) 75(75) 0.05
SAT/TAT (%) 50(21) 54(23) 0.02*
SSAT/TAT (%) 35(23) 39(24) 0.45
DSAT/TAT (%) 25(12) 28(12) 0.28
Weight Stable Sub-Groupc
WC (cm2) 105(18) 109(18) 0.40
SSAT (cm2) 95(48) 124(58) <0.01*
DSAT (cm2) 86(47) 88(68) 0.22
VAT (cm2) 171(155) 167(148) 0.64
a

Paired t-test used for comparisons between cases and controls for continuous data.

b

Sample size for WC, SSAT and DSAT was 68 males per group.

c

Sample size for weight stable sub-group was 49 per group and 43 per group for WC, SSAT and DSAT.

*

Significant p-value < 0.05.