Table 5.

Change in treatment approach based on second-opinion interpretations of GynOnc MRI by sub-specialized radiologists.

Change in Treatment Approach (Outside reports → 2nd-opinion interpretation)	Number of patients	%
SURGEON 1
Surgical → Non-surgical approach	35/469	7.5% (95%CI:5.3–10.3)
Change in surgical procedure type/extent	19/469	4.1% (95%CI:2.5–6.4)
Non-surgical → Surgical approach	11/469	2.3% (95%CI:1.2–4.3)
Biopsy → Observation or follow-up with imaging	4/469	0.85% (95%CI:0.3–2.3)
Follow-up with imaging → Colonoscopy	1/469	0.2% (95%CI:5.3–10.3)
Observation → Follow-up with imaging	1/469	0.2% (95%CI:0.01–1.37)
SURGEON 2
Surgical → Non-surgical approach	31/469	6.6% (95%CI:4.6–9.4)
Change in surgical procedure type/extent	12/469	2.5% (95%CI:1.4–4.6)
Non-surgical → Surgical approach	9/469	1.9 % (95%CI:0.9–3.7)
Biopsy or Dilatation and Curettage → Surgical approach	3/469	0.6% (95%CI:0.2–2.0)
Biopsy → Observation	2/469	0.4% (95%CI:0.07–1.70)
Follow-up with imaging → Hysteroscopy	2/469	0.4% (95%CI:0.07–1.70)
Observation → Follow-up with imaging	1/469	0.2% (95%CI:0.01–1.37)
Biopsy → Medical treatment	1/469	0.2% (95%CI:0.01–1.37)