Table 3.
Crude and adjusted odds ratio in simple and multiple logistic regression analyses of the association between neighbourhood and route environment characteristics and change in commuting mode stratified by commuting modes at baseline, with adjustment for age, sex and BMI
| Uptake of active commuting | Maintenance of active commuting | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model a | p | Model b | p | Model a | p | Model b | p | |
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |||||
| Neighbourhood Environment | ||||||||
| Effective walkable area (EWA) (Reference: Lowest) | ||||||||
| Second quartile | 0.69 (0.36–1.31) | 0.02 | 0.62 (0.30–1.29) | 0.02 | ||||
| Third Quartile | - | - | - | - | 0.85 (0.44–1.63) | 0.75 (0.35–1.60) | ||
| Highest | - | - | - | - | 0.43 (0.22–0.82) | 0.32 (0.15–0.68) | ||
| Route Environment | ||||||||
| Distance from home to work (Reference: <1.5 km) | ||||||||
| 1.5–4 km | 0.31 (0.19–0.52) | <0.001 | 0.23 (0.13–0.39) | <0.001 | 2.94 (1.59–5.42) | <0.001 | 2.85 (1.45–5.59) | <0.001 |
| 4–10 km | 0.08 (0.04–0.13) | 0.06 (0.03–0.11) | 8.34 (4.33–16.10) | 8.82 (4.15–18.80) | ||||
| Main or secondary road on route (Reference: No) | ||||||||
| Yes | - | - | - | - | 2.71 (1.56–4.69) | <0.001 | 1.97 (1.04–3.73) | 0.04 |
| Number of streetlights per 100 m (Reference: Lowest) | ||||||||
| Second quartile | 3.54 (1.83–6.86) | <0.001 | 2.54 (1.24–5.21) | <0.001 | - | - | - | - |
| Third Quartile | 2.26 (1.12–4.58) | 2.04 (0.95–4.39) | - | - | - | - | ||
| Highest | 4.77 (2.46–9.24) | 5.45 (2.62–11.33) | - | - | - | - | ||
Model a: Univariate associations
Model b: Adjusted for baseline age, sex and BMI as well as other environmental predictors listed