Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 26.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2014 Mar;22(2):389–399. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2013.2294904

Table 4.

Performance measures (mean ± SEM) for subjects in the virtual reality based therapy (VRBT) group and the customized vestibular physical therapy group (PT) for pre-treatment vs. post-treatment vs. 6-month (6M) follow-up. P-values obtained from mixed factor repeated measures ANOVA.

Group Pre Post 6 month
Follow-up
Group
p-value
Time
p-value
Group × Time
p-value
DGI VRBT
PT
21 ± 2
19 ± 5
22 ± 2
21 ± 4
22 ± 2
20 ± 6
0.14 0.034
(Post > Pre)
0.67
FGA VRBT
PT
24 ± 7
21 ± 7
25 ± 3
24 ± 6
25 ± 4
23 ± 7
0.11 0.049
(Bonferroni NS)
0.49
Gait speed (m/s) VRBT
PT
1.10 ± .2
1.10 ± .2
1.14 ± .1
1.15 ± .3
1.12 ± .1
1.10 ± .2
0.60 0.007
(Post > Pre)
0.046
TUG (s) VRBT
PT
9.0 ± 1.6
10.5 ± 3.6
9.2 ± 1.3
9.5 ± 3.5
9.3 ± 1.5
9.9 ± 3.2
0.31 0.13 0.29
SOT VRBT
PT
63 ± 18
55 ± 20
68 ± 19
57 ± 24
69 ± 17
62 ± 20
0.14 0.040
(6M > Pre)
0.50

Higher scores on the Functional Gait Assessment (FGA), Dynamic Gait Index (DGI), gait speed, and Sensory Organization Test (SOT) indicate better outcomes. Lower scores on the Timed Up and Go (TUG) indicate better outcomes.