Table 2.

Hazard ratios for the Associations of Everyday Discrimination and All-cause Mortality, Incident Stroke, Incident Coronary Heart Disease, and Heart Failure Hospitalization

Model	All-cause mortality		Incident stroke		Coronary heart disease		Heart failure hospitalization
	Hazard Ratio (95% CI)d	P-value	Hazard Ratio (95% CI) d	P-value	Hazard Ratio (95% CI) d	P-value	Hazard Ratio (95% CI) d	P-value
1: Unadjusted	0.74 (0.67, 0.81)	< .001	0.76 (0.63, 0.91)	.003	0.88 (0.76, 1.03)	.11	0.79 (0.70, 0.89)	< .001
2: Age and Sex	0.94 (0.85, 1.03)	.16	0.93 (0.78, 1.11)	.40	1.05 (0.91, 1.22)	.49	0.99 (0.89, 1.12)	.92
3: M2+Behavioral/Clinicala	0.91 (0.83, 1.00)	.05	0.90 (0.75, 1.07)	.24	1.05 (0.90, 1.21)	.54	0.97 (0.86, 1.08)	.55
4: M3+Socioeconomicb	0.90 (0.82, 0.99)	.03	0.91 (0.76, 1.08)	.28	1.04 (0.90, 1.20)	.62	0.96 (0.85, 1.08)	.50
5: M4+Social Supportc	0.90 (0.82, 0.99)	.02	0.90 (0.76, 1.08)	.27	1.04 (0.90, 1.20)	.62	0.96 (0.85, 1.08)	.49

^aAdjusted for all variables in model 2 plus smoking status, body mass index, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus, estimated glomerular filtration rate

^bAdjusted for all variables in model 3 plus income, education, occupation, perceived standing in the community, healthcare access. Due to low event counts, 3 variables were re-parameterized to reduce the total degrees of freedom for the incident stroke and incident coronary heart disease models only: (1) income was reduced to 3 categories, (2) education was treated as continuous, and (3) occupation was dichotomized.

^cAdjusted for all variables in model 4 plus social support

^dHazard ratios are per 1-point increase in everyday discrimination