Skip to main content
. 2005 Mar 5;330(7490):503. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38356.655266.82

Table 2.

Secondary measures (intention to treat analysis; figures are numbers (percentages) unless stated otherwise)

Hypericum (n=122) Paroxetine (n=122) Difference (hypericum minus paroxetine) (95% CI), P value
Change from baseline to day 42:
MADRS (mean (SD); median) 16.4 (10.7); 17.0 12.6 (10.6); 14.0 3.8 (1.1 to 6.5), 0.01*
BDI (mean (SD); median) 10.2 (10.3); 9.0 7.0 (9.3); 5.5 3.2 (0.7 to 5.7), 0.01*
Scores by day 42:
Clinical global impressions:
Item 1 improved by ≥2 categories 71 (58) 52 (43) 16 (3 to 28), 0.02
Item 2 much or very much improved 83 (68) 70 (57) 11 (-1 to 23), 0.09
Item 3 marked therapeutic effect 49 (40) 36 (30) 11 (-1 to 23), 0.08
Global efficacy self rating very good or good 65 (53) 55 (45) 8 (-4 to 21), 0.20

MADRS=Montgomery-Åsberg depression rating scale; BDI=Beck depression inventory.

*

t test for difference (calculated for pooled data from both study stages).

119 in hypericum group, 120 in paroxetine group.

χ2 test for difference (calculated for pooled data from both study stages).