Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 3;9(3):727–739. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2014.11.008

Table 2.

Multivariable Cox regression analysis of GC patients' prognosis in training, validation and combining sets.

Variables Training set Validation set Combining set
HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
Overall survival
Age (≥58 vs. < 58) 1.26 (0.83–1.54) 0.397 1.12 (0.61–1.41) 0.665 1.18 (0.72–1.49) 0.547
Sex (male vs. female) 1.17 (0.86–1.45) 0.748 1.37 (0.88–1.64) 0.339 1.23 (0.84–1.56) 0.438
Tumor site (proximal + middle vs. distal) 1.13 (0.66–1.74) 0.437 0.98 (0.81–1.32) 0.933 1.06 (0.78–1.44) 0.864
TNM stage (III + IV vs. I + II) 2.51 (1.29–5.39) 0.001 2.36 (1.22–5.17) 0.006 2.43 (1.24–5.26) 0.004
Differentiation (poor vs. well + moderate) 1.63 (0.89–2.27) 0.171 1.77 (0.92–2.89) 0.102 1.68 (0.94–2.37) 0.115
Lauren classification (diffuse vs. intestinal) 1.74 (0.97–2.53) 0.075 1.69 (0.88–2.36) 0.121 1.72 (0.94–2.46) 0.107
RTL (short vs. long) 2.95 (1.31–5.53) 0.001 2.46 (1.18–4.37) 0.005 2.78 (1.24–4.48) 0.003
Chemotherapya (yes vs. no) 0.41 (0.17–0.84) 0.008 0.49 (0.21–0.86) 0.012 0.47 (0.19–0.84) 0.009
Relapse‐free survival
Age (≥58 vs. <58) 1.13 (0.86–1.36) 0.769 1.09 (0.79–1.52) 0.541 1.10 (0.83–1.45) 0.494
Sex (male vs. female) 1.20 (0.73–1.98) 0.354 1.25 (0.91–1.69) 0.113 1.21 (0.87–1.78) 0.215
Tumor site (proximal + middle vs. distal) 1.28 (0.76–1.87) 0.247 1.15 (0.81–1.47) 0.673 1.19 (0.78–1.64) 0.345
TNM stage (III + IV vs. I + II) 2.46 (1.38–5.93) <0.001 2.41 (1.28–5.48) 0.002 2.45 (1.22–5.36) 0.003
Differentiation (poor vs. well + moderate) 1.61 (0.82–2.81) 0.178 1.69 (0.89–2.97) 0.102 1.67 (0.87–2.86) 0.115
Lauren classification (diffuse vs. intestinal) 1.65 (0.91–2.59) 0.084 1.73 (0.98–2.88) 0.062 1.69 (0.95–2.64) 0.073
RTL (short vs. long) 2.76 (1.22–4.73) 0.004 2.52 (1.21–3.98) 0.006 2.64 (1.19–4.55) 0.007
Chemotherapya (yes vs. no) 0.42 (0.20–0.91) 0.022 0.51 (0.24–0.88) 0.016 0.49 (0.28–0.80) 0.017

Notes: RTL, relative telomere length; HR, hazard ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; TNM, tumor‐node‐metastasis.

We calculated hazarded ratios and P values with an adjusted multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model, including RTL, age, sex, tumor site, TNM stage, differentiation, Lauren classification, and chemotherapy as covariates. Significant P value was in bold.

a

Only including stage II and stage III GC patients.