Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Nov 2;69(12):1863–1870. doi: 10.1002/acr.23211

Table 2.

Multivariate adjusted associations between sex-specific quartiles of total hip aBMD and incident hip ROA and sROA, the Johnston County Project

Overall
Hip ROA
N=921
Hip sROA
N=1,258
Number of Incident Cases HR (95% CI) P-trend Number of Incident Cases HR (95% CI) P-trend
Quartiles total hip aBMD 0.215 0.024
1 (low aBMD) 67 Ref 44 Ref
2 (intermediate low aBMD) 67 0.72 (0.51, 1.03) 31 0.68 (0.42, 1.09)
3 (intermediate high aBMD) 64 0.87 (0.58, 1.31) 27 0.52 (0.31, 0.86)
4 (high aBMD) 52 0.69 (0.45, 1.06) 23 0.56 (0.31, 0.97)
Excluding Incident Hip Replacements
Hip sROA
N=1,239
Number of Incident Cases HR (95% CI) P-trend
Quartiles total hip BMD 0.021
1 (low aBMD) 36 Ref
2 (intermediate aBMD) 28 0.78 (0.47, 1.27)
3 (intermediate aBMD) 22 0.52 (0.30, 0.90)
4 (high aBMD) 19 0.54 (0.28, 1.02)

Abbreviations: aBMD, areal bone mineral density; BMI, body mass index; ROA, radiographic osteoarthritis; sROA, symptomatic radiographic osteoarthritis

All models adjusted for age, sex, race, education, BMI, smoking history, physical activity, history of knee injury, steroid use, and bisphosphonate use.

Ns differed from analytic samples because of missing covariate values.

Participants with 1 or neither condition (ROA and symptoms) in a hip at baseline were included.

A test of linear trend across quartiles of aBMD was performed based on the ordinal value for each quartile

Values are bolded to indicate statistical significance