Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Nov 2;69(12):1863–1870. doi: 10.1002/acr.23211

Table 3.

Multivariate adjusted associations between sex-specific quartiles of total hip aBMD* and incident knee ROA and sROA, the Johnston County (JoCo OA) Project

Overall
Knee ROA
N=969
Knee sROA
N=1,133
Number of Incident Cases HR (95% CI) P-trend Number of Incident Cases HR (95% CI) P-trend
Quartiles total hip aBMD 0.120 0.325
1 (low aBMD) 47 Ref 28 Ref
2 (intermediate low aBMD) 71 1.57 (1.07, 2.15) 50 2.15 (1.40, 3.30)
3 (intermediate high aBMD) 72 1.64 (1.14, 2.36) 45 1.65 (1.02, 2.67)
4 (high aBMD) 55 1.33 (0.90, 1.99) 27 1.57 (0.86, 2.86)
Excluding Incident Knee Replacements
Knee sROA
N=1,123
Number of Incident Cases HR (95% CI) P-trend
Quartiles total hip a BMD 0.569
1 (low aBMD) 28 Ref
2 (intermediate aBMD) 48 2.03 (1.31, 3.13)
3 (intermediate aBMD) 39 1.44 (0.87, 2.37)
4 (high aBMD) 25 1.42 (0.76, 2.64)

Abbreviations: BMD, Bone Mineral Density; BMI, Body Mass Index; ROA, Radiographic Osteoarthritis; sROA, symptomatic Radiographic Osteoarthritis

All models adjusted for age, sex, race, education, BMI, smoking history, physical activity, history of knee injury, steroid use, and bisphosphonate use. Ns differed from analytic samples because of missing covariate values.

Participants with 1 or neither condition (ROA and symptoms) in a hip at baseline were included

A test of linear trend across quartiles of aBMD was performed based on the ordinal value for each quartile

Values are bolded to indicate statistical significance