Skip to main content
. 2005 Feb 22;102(9):3236–3241. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409201102

Table 3. Effect of Fe protein variants and various nucleotides on FeMoco maturation.

Factors Activities*
Fe protein
No Fe protein 0 (0)
WT Fe protein 196 ± 6 (100)
A157S Fe protein 18 ± 4 (9)
A157G Fe protein§ 11 ± 1 (6)
M156C Fe protein 6 ± 2 (3)
Nucleotide
No nucleotide 0 (0)
ATP 186 ± 10 (100)
ADP** 0 (0)
ATPγS** 0 (0)
AMPPNP** 0 (0)

Data are expressed as nmol of C2H4 evolution per min per mg of protein. Percentages are given in parentheses. ATPγS, adenosine 5′-O-(3-thiotriphosphate; AMPPNP, 5′-adenylylimidodiphosphate.

*

The lower detection limit was 0.01 nmol of C2H4 evolution per min per mg of protein

All Fe protein variants are able to bind MgATP (2729)

A157S Fe protein is unable to undergo a MgATP-induced conformational change and does not support MgATP hydrolysis (27)

§

A157G Fe protein undergoes a delayed conformational change upon MgATP binding, resulting in a reduced substrate-reduction activity (28)

M156C Fe protein undergoes a MgATP-induced conformational change that differs from WT Fe protein, resulting in the loss of substrate-reduction activity (29)

Identical results have been obtained by using 10-, 50-, and 100-fold molar excess of nucleotides relative to Fe protein in the FeMoco-maturation assay

**

Note that, with the addition of excess MgATP as described in Materials and Methods, these nucleotides do not inhibit substrate-reduction activity of the WT MoFe protein