Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 26;7:6517. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06876-8

Table 2.

Results of the FC analysis in 13 CN+ and 32 CN− subjects.

ROI Bands Number of links PLV (mean ± SD) t-test Effect size FC changes Correlation with
(motif size) CN+ CN− p value Cohen’s d in CN+‡ DMNSUVR §
Intra ROI FC PCu Delta 39 0.433 ± 0.024 0.470 ± 0.022 <0.001 1.64 Hypo −0.582***
Inter ROI FC PCu - rIPL Delta 47 0.366 ± 0.008 0.343 ± 0.011 <0.001 2.24 Hyper 0.677***
Theta 41 0.288 ± 0.015 0.265 ± 0.009 <0.001 2.16 Hyper 0.673***
PCu - lIPL Delta 29 0.365 ± 0.011 0.343 ± 0.010 <0.001 2.17 Hyper 0.614***
Theta 37 0.287 ± 0.009 0.265 ± 0.010 <0.001 2.31 Hyper 0.704***
Alpha 39 0.264 ± 0.012 0.286 ± 0.014 <0.001 1.72 Hypo −0.473**

The p values were Bonferroni corrected by multiplying by 5 (the number of frequency bands). FC changes in the CN+ group compared with the CN− group. Hypo, decreased connectivity in the CN+; Hyper, increased connectivity in the CN+. §Correlation coefficient (r) for each FC value with PiB mean standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) value within the default mode network (DMN) ROIs (DMNSUVR). The asterisks indicate statistically significant correlations (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001). PCu: precuneus, rIPL: right inferior parietal lobule, lIPL: left inferior parietal lobule.